Sources and limitations

Research Library

The evidence behind Life in the AI Age, translated into plain language without hiding the uncertainty.

Labour-market evidence

Employment, hiring, earnings, hours, job postings, and career-entry patterns.

Task and usage evidence

What AI systems are used for, which tasks they touch, and where exposure is mistaken for elimination.

Productivity evidence

Controlled experiments and field studies—including results where AI helps, does little, or makes experts slower.

AI and Jobs — Evidence Baseline, 2023–2026

This public summary brings together research about occupational exposure, observed AI use, task productivity, organisational response, and labour-market outcomes. These are different questions. A study can answer one without answering the others.

Current scope: the evidence supports meaningful task automation, pressure on some entry-level and freelance work, and substantial workflow reorganisation. It does not establish economy-wide occupational disappearance.

What the evidence can show

  • AI may affect particular tasks without replacing the whole occupation.
  • Observed employment pressure is concentrated in some highly exposed entry-level and modular work.
  • AI adoption can reorganise tasks even when short-term earnings and hours show little aggregate change.
  • Productivity effects vary by task, worker experience, context, review burden, and workflow maturity.

What it does not show by itself

  • An exposure percentage is not a jobs-lost forecast.
  • A productivity gain does not automatically mean fewer workers.
  • Observed use on one platform is not economy-wide adoption.
  • A labour-market correlation does not automatically prove that AI caused the outcome.

Research status: living baseline; claims and source versions require periodic review. Last reviewed 2026-08-03.

Primary sources and further reading

This page is a public summary, not a substitute for the underlying papers. It does not expose private project files, unpublished notes, or internal research paths.

Library status

The research library is active. Public summaries will be added as evidence packages are verified, with source links, limitations, and review dates recorded alongside each topic.